Past Issue

Volume 20, Number 1, Spring 2018, Serial Number: 77, Pages: 78-83

Original Article(s)

Epigenetic Aberration of FMR1 Gene in Infertile Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve


Hossein Eslami,, M.Sc, 1,2Ali Eslami,, M.Sc, 1,2Raha Favaedi,, M.Sc, 2Ummolbanin Asadpour,, M.Sc, 2Shabnam Zari Moradi,, M.Sc., 2Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi,, Ph.D., 3Tahereh Madani,, M.D., 4Maryam Shahhoseini,, Ph.D., 2,*Anahita Mohseni Meybodi,, Ph.D., 2,*
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Department of Genetics, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Department of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Address: P.O. BOX: 16635-148 Department of Genetics Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine ACECR Tehran Iran Emails:m.shahhoseini@royaninstitute.org,anahitamohseni@royaninstitute.org

Abstract

Objective

The diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is a condition characterized by a reduction in the number and/or quality of oocytes. This primary infertility disorder is usually accompanied with an increase in the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels and regular menses. Although there are many factors contributing to the DOR situation, it is likely that many of idiopathic cases have genetic/epigenetic bases. The association between the FMR1 premutation (50-200 CGG repeats) and the premature ovarian failure (POF) suggests that epigenetic disorders of FMR1 can act as a risk factor for the DOR as well. The aim of this study was to analyze the mRNA expression and epigenetic alteration (histone acetylation/methylation) of the FMR1 gene in blood and granulosa cells of 20 infertile women.

Materials and Methods

In this case-control study, we analyzed the mRNA expression and epigenetic altration of the FMR1 gene in blood and granulosa cells of 20 infertile women. These women were referred to the Royan Institute, having been clinically diagnosed as DOR patients. Our control group consisted of 20 women with normal antral follicle numbers and serum FSH level. All these women had normal karyotype and no history of genetic disorders. The number of CGG triplet repeats in the exon 1 of the FMR1 gene was analyzed in all samples.

Results

Results clearly demonstrated significantly higher expression of the FMR1 gene in blood and granulosa cells of the DOR patients with the FMR1 premutation compared to the control group. In addition, epigenetic marks of histone 3 lysine 9 acetylation (H3K9ac) and di-metylation (H3K9me2) showed significantly higher incorporations in the regulatory regions of the FMR1 gene, including the promoter and the exon 1, whereas tri-metylation (H3K9me3) mark showed no significant difference between two groups.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrates, for the first time, the dynamicity of gene expression and histone modification pattern in regulation of FMR1 gene, and implies the key role played by epigenetics in the development of the ovarian function.

Introduction

One of the well-known causes of female infertility is the diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). DOR is characterized by a reduction in the number and/or quality of oocytes, low likelihood of establishing a pregnancy, increased miscarriage rates, and poor response to ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) (1, 2). The prevalence of DOR has been estimated to be approximately 10% among young women (3, 4). Despite its prevalence, its etiology remains a mystery. Aging is the most common cause of diminished ovarian reserve. Other reasons for the diminished ovarian reserve include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, autoimmune diseases, and certain genetic conditions (5).

The fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) is located at Xq27.3 and is responsible for the fragile X syndrome, a form of X-linked mental retardation. This disorder is caused by the expansion of a polymorphic CGG trinucleotide repeat in the promoter of the FMR1 gene, consisting of more than 200 repeats (full mutation), instead of the usual 6-54 CGG repeats (6, 7). This trinucleotide expansion induces methylation of cytosines within the CpG islands inside the repeat tract and in the flanking sequence, including the FMR1 gene promoter, resulting in the epigenetic inactivation of the gene, which in turn switches off the production of the FMR1 protein (FMRP) (8-10). Premutation alleles (55-200 CGG repeats) have been associated with premature ovarian failure (POF).

It has been reported that the rearrangements of the X chromosome are associated with the POF (11). Two main critical regions in the long arm of X chromosome are identified which contain putative POF candidate genes: POF1 (Xq26-q28) (12) and POF2 (Xq13.3-q22) (13). In POF-1, the FMR1 gene is the most prominent candidate gene. The relationship between FMR1 premutation status and POF disease suggests that the FMR1 gene increases the risk of the POF (14, 15), and, based on the recent studies, the DOR pathogenesis (16, 17). Besides, the impact of shorter repeats (45-54 repeats), which are only slightly longer than normal, is less clear (17, 18).

Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in gene activity and expression that occur without change in DNA sequence (19, 20). Two of the most well-known epigenetic modifications are chemical modifications on cytosine residues of DNA (DNA methylation) and post-translational modification of histones associated with DNA (histone modifications) (19). Functionally, the patterns of epigenetic modifications can serve as epigenetic markers to represent the dynamic level of gene activity and expression, based on the chromatin state (21-23). These modifications play an important role in regulating gene expression by modulating the packaging of DNA in the nucleus as chromatin domains (23-25).

DNA methylation can suppress transcription through several mechanisms, including direct inhibition binding of transcription factor to gene promoters and indirect inhibition, through the induction of changes in local chromatin structure at the site of methylation. As such, methyl-CpG binding proteins (e.g., MeCP2 and MBDs) recognize methylated CpG regions, where they can acts as mediators of transcriptional repression through the association with histone deacetylases (HDACs) in repressor complexes (26-28). Histone modification is another epigenetic mechanism that is mostly known by acetylation and methylation of lysine (K) residues in N-terminal tails of histone proteins (22, 29). Histone methylation can result in the activation or the inhibition of gene expression, depending on the localization of the covalently modified lysine residue (30). For example, tri-methylation of histone 3 at lysine 4 and di/tri-methylation at lysine 9 (H3K4me and H3K9me) are particularly correlated with transcriptional activation and repression, respectively (31, 32). On the other hnad, acetylation of histones is commonly linked to active transcription (26, 27).

Several histone modifications are reported for the FMR1 gene. In cells with the full mutation of FMR1, CGG repeats are hypermethylated at H3K9 and hypomethylated at H3K4, and low levels of acetylation of histones are detected, while normally, histones H3 and H4 are hyperacetylated, H3K4 is hypermethylated, and H3K9 is hypomethylated (33-35). Previous studies have shown that the treatment of fragile X lymphoblastoid cells with the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (5-azadC) leads to the transcriptional reactivation of the FMR1 gene (36). In addition, the treatment of these cells with HDAC inhibitors (i.e., butyrate and tricostatin A) resulted in a modest reactivation of the FMR1 gene. The reactivation were enhanced when the HDAC inhibitors were used synergistically with 5-azadC (37). According to our knowledge, this is the first report of the analysis and comparison of the expression levels of the FMR1 gene in blood and granulosa cells and the evaluation of above mentioned histone modification changes of the FMR1 gene based on the analysis of the blood cells of infertile women with DOR.

Materials and Methods

In this study case-control study, samples for epigenetic changes and gene expression analysis were categorized into two groups: DOR patients and control groups, based on follicles number, FSH levels, and the number of CGG repeats. A total of 20 infertile women with clinically confirmed DOR conditions and the FMR1 premutation were recruited at Department of Genetics of the Royan Institute. Any member of the DOR group had to satisfy the following conditions: Patients with 3 oocytes with a conventional stimulation protocol, antral follicle counts (AFC)<5-7 (2-10 mm in diameter, measured using the standardized two- dimensional technique), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels>11 IU/l at day 3 of the follicular cycle, <40 years of old, and regular menstrual cycles for the past 6 months (Table 1,). Among the DOR patients, only patients with the FMR1 gene premutation (CGG repeats >55) were enrolled as the case group. Also, 20 women with normal antral follicle numbers and serum FSH level were selected as the controls (age 37.38 ± 1.32) (Table 1,). Women with abnormal karyotypes and X chromosomal mosaics were excluded from the study. All samples were collected during a one-year period (2013-2014). All patients and control subjects were Iranian, living in different places in Iran. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for clinical research at the Royan institute and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Table 1-Comparison of age, FSH level and AFC among of the patients and the controls

DNA extraction and premutation analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood cells using the standard salting out method (described in (38). The 5’ UTR of the FMR1 gene containing the CGG repeats was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique by a reverse and forward primer set following Tassone et al. (39). The PCR products were separated on a 3% NuSieve 3:1 agarose gel by electrophoresis (Lonza, USA) at 33 v for 4 hours. Each DNA band were purified from the gel by High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche Applied Science, USA) and amplified by the PCR program described above. As the betaine-PCR (39) is unable to distinguish between heterozygotes of full mutation and normal homozygotes, samples that resulted in the primary PCR products with a single band were subjected to a secondary PCR screen with the R primer and the CCG-chimeric primer, instead of the F primer. Consequently, we used a chimeric CGGprimer in conjunction with betaine-PCR. The amplified product will generate a smear on the gel when there is an expanded allele present, whereas in the absence of an expanded allele no large smear will be detected. The numbers of trinucleotide repeats were confirmed by Sanger sequencing method using ABI 3730XL Capillary Sequencer. Sequencing results were compared with the sequence of a normal FMR1 gene.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis

The blood and granulosa cells of 20 Iranian DOR patients (the case group) were used for RNA extraction, in order to study mRNA gene expression. Besides, patients with normal blood FSH level and more than three follicles were used as the control group (n=20). Total RNA was extracted from patient’s blood and granulosa cells using the Absolutely RNA Nanoprep kit (Aligent, USA). The integrity of total RNA was checked by denaturing formaldehyde/MOPS/1% agarose electrophoresis and then checking its purity via UV-spectrophotometry in 10 mM Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4-buffer (pH=7.0). The A260/ A280-ratio was >2.0. Two distinct ribosomal RNA bands were identified in each sample examined. To remove genomic DNA, a DNase treatment was carried out using the RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen, USA). We reverse transcribed RNA by QuantiTect Whole Transcriptome kit (Qiagen, USA). To exclude genomic amplification, PCR was performed with the same total RNA samples without reverse transcriptase. Products were analyzed on 4% agarose gel.

One Step Quantitative RT-PCR was performed by the 7500 Real time PCR system (Applied Bio System, USA), using Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Bio System, USA) in triplicate reaction to ensure consistency. Temperature profile of the real time-PCR consists of 95°C for 4 minutes, 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 seconds and 60°C for 30 seconds. The FMR1 amplicon was an 89 bp product, spanning between the exons 13 and 14 of the gene. GAPDH was used to verify the quality of cDNA synthesis and PCR reaction (Table 2,). The 2-ΔΔCt was calculated for the obtained data. REST384-ß (2006) software was used to compare means between groups.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with real- time polymerase chain reaction

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments were performed on the regulatory regions of FMR1 gene [described in (38)] using Low Cell ChIP Kit (Diagenode, Belgium) and antibodies (anti histone H3 acetyl K9 antibody, anti histone H3 di-methyl K9 and anti histone H3 tri-methyl K9 (all by Abcam, UK), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Chromatin from 1×104 cells was used for each immunoprecipitation reaction. Quantitative real-time PCR amplification was performed on DNA recovered from the ChIP and the total chromatin input. Five microliters of immunoprecipitated DNA (from a total 50 µl) was quantified in triplicate by real-time PCR, using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (AB Applied Biosystems, USA) on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA). The primers used for PCR analysis were designed to amplify two different regions of the FMR1 gene: the promoter region and the exon 1 near the CGG repeat. The primer pairs for ChIP experiment are listed in Table 2. Temperature profile of the real time PCR consists of 95°C 10 minutes, 40 cycles of 95°C 15 seconds and 60°C 1 minute. Data is presented as the fold enrichment of different immunoprecipitated DNA relative to a 1/100 dilution of input chromatin.

Table 2- Primer pairs which used in this study

Statistical analysis of real-time polymerase chain reaction

Values were expressed as means SEM. All data were analyzed using the independent sample t test. Differences were considered statistically significant if P<0.05.

Results

Premutation analysis of FMR1 gene

The results of CGG trinucleotide expansion in the DOR patients compared with normal individuals, has been previously reported (17). The frequency of premutation alleles was statistically higher in the DOR patients in comparison with the controls (P<0.05), but the difference in the incidence of intermediate alleles was not statistically significant between these groups.

Expression analysis of FMR1 gene

Relative mRNA expression of FMR1 gene in granulosa and blood cells of the control group and the DOR patients with FMR1 premutation was performed using quantitative real time-PCR method. The results clearly demonstrate that the expression of FMR1 gene in both sample types of DOR patients was about 2 fold higher than that of the control group. This increase in gene expression level was statistically significant in both types of cell samples (P<0.05, Fig .1,).

- Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of FMR1 mRNA levels in blood and granulose cells. The results are presented as 2-ΔΔCt (mean ± SEM) relative to the GAPDH as the endogenous control. *; Significant difference of FMR1 gene in the DOR patients vs. the controlgroup in P<0.05 and DOR; Diminished ovarian reserve.

Epigenetic profile of FMR1 gene regulatory regions

In order to evaluate the probable epigenetic alterationsoccurred in the regulatory region of the FMR1 gene, and the level of incorporated histone marks, we focused on known epigenetic marks of lysine 9 residue of long tailedhistone 3. Evaluated histone marks in this study were H3K9ac (an euchromatin associated mark) and H3K9me2/ me3 (heterochromatin associated marks). Data analysis in the regulatory region of FMR1 gene demonstrated that the incorporation (presence) of H3K9ac and H3K9me2 in the promoter and the exon 1 region were significantly higher in the DOR patient in comparison with the control group (P<0.05), whereas the incorporation of H3K9me3 in the regions showed no significant difference (P>0.05, Figes.2,, 3,).

- Chromation immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis of histone modifications in the promoter region of the FMR1 gene in blood cells. The results are expressed relative to a 1/100 dilution of the input chromatin (mean ± SEM). *; Significant difference of incorporated histone marks in the DOR patients vs. the control group in P<0.05 and DOR; Diminished ovarian reserve.
- Chromation immunoprecipitation analysis (ChIP) of histone modifications in the exon1 region of the FMR1 gene in blood cells. The results are expressed relative to a 1/100 dilution of input chromatin (mean ± SEM). *; Significant difference of incorporated histone marks in DOR patients vs. control group in P<0.05 and DOR; Diminished ovarian reserve.

Discussion

The FMR1 gene is transcribed in many tissues including the leukocytes. The previous studies suggested that the FMR1 gene has a direct effect on the follicular recruitment and the ovarian reserve, implying that it has an important role in ovarian physiology and female fecundity. We investigated the epigenetic marks of methylation and acetylation of H3K9 on the regulatory region of FMR1 gene and the resulting transcriptional activity of the gene in blood cells of patients with diminished ovarian reserve. The CGG repeat lies in the 5’-UTR of the first exon of the FMR1 gene. Detailed analysis of the FMR1 gene has revealed that the transcriptional regulation of the FMR1 gene is influenced by the methylation boundary at approximately 600-800 nucleotides upstream of the CGG repeat (40, 41). The epigenetic modifications of the full mutation alleles include histone modifications, which consist of deacetylation of histones H3 and H4, low levels of lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation, and high levels of lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation. All of these changes are associated with a transcriptionally inactive heterochromatic configuration (33, 34, 42).

Several studies investigated the epigenetic modifications of the FMR1 gene in the full mutation alleles associated with fragile X syndrome. These studies demonstrated that the transcription and the translation of a methylated full mutation can be relatively restored by treating fragile X cells with the DNA demethylating drug 5-azadC (36), whereas treatment with the inhibitors of histone deacetylases (TSA and 4-phenylbutyrate) was found to enhance the effect of 5-azadC, leading to changes in the epigenetic code of histones H3 and H4 (37, 42).

In our study, epigenetic change of the FMR1 gene consist of H3K9ac, H3K9me2, and H3K9me3, which were examined in the promoter and the exon 1 region. Our results showed that the incorporation of H3K9ac and H3K9me2 were significantly higher in the regulatory region of FMR1 in the DOR patient in comparison with the control groups, whereas the incorporation of H3K9me3 showed no significant difference. Based on the epigenetic profile data, it can be interpreted that although the presence of CGG repeats causes an increase in H3K9me2 level, but this hypermethylation is not a permanent state of heterochromatination. On the other hand, the dominant hyperacetylation mark observed in this region is strongly correlated with over expression of FMR1 gene in the DOR patients rather than the control group.

Conclusion

According to the finding obtained in this study, we propose that an increase in the number of CGG repeats to 55-200 results in the changes in the chromatin structure, which itself leads to the recruitment of histone modifier elements to this part of the genome. These epigenetic alterations cause the different expression of FMR1 gene observed in the diminished ovarian failure.

Acknowledgements

This project was financially supported by the Royan Institute (Grant No. 91000018). The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest in this study and would like to dedicate this paper to the memory of Dr. Saeid Kazemi Ashtiani.

Author’s Contributions

Author’s Contributions

H.E., A.E.; Carried out the experiment, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript with support from R.F., in technical performance, data analysis and drafting the manuscript. U.A., Sh.Z.M.; Contributed in technical performance of experiment. P.E.-Y., T.M.; Helped in sample collection. M.Sh., A.M.M.; Conceived of the idea and gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

Broekmans FJ, Knauff EA, te Velde ER, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 18(2): 58-65.
Broekmans FJ, Soules MR, Fauser BC. Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev. 2009; 30(5): 465-493.
Nikolaou D, Templeton A. Early ovarian ageing: a hypothesis.Detection and clinical relevance. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18(6): 1137-1139.
Scott RT, Leonardi MR, Hofmann GE, Illions EH, Neal GS, Navot D. A prospective evaluation of clomiphene citrate challenge test screening of the general infertility population. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82(4 Pt 1): 539-544.
Pal L, Bevilacqua K, Santoro NF. Chronic psychosocial stressors are detrimental to ovarian reserve: a study of infertile women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 31(3): 130-139.
Brennan FX, Albeck DS, Paylor R. FMR1 knockout mice are impaired in a leverpress escape/avoidance task. Genes Brain Behav. 2006; 5(6): 467-471.
Fu YH, Kuhl DP, Pizzuti A, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, Richards S. Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox. Cell. 1991; 67(6): 1047-1058.
Feng Y, Zhang F, Lokey LK, Chastain JL, Lakkis L, Eberhart D. Translational suppression by trinucleotide repeat expansion at FMR1. Science. 1995; 268(5211): 731-734.
Hornstra IK, Nelson DL, Warren ST, Yang TP. High resolution methylation analysis of the FMR1 gene trinucleotide repeat region in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1993; 2(10): 1659-1665.
Pieretti M, Zhang FP, Fu YH, Warren ST, Oostra BA, Caskey CT. Absence of expression of the FMR-1 gene in fragile X syndrome. Cell. 1991; 66(4): 817-822.
Kalantari H, Madani T, Zari Moradi S, Mansouri Z, Almadani N, Gourabi H. Cytogenetic analysis of 179 Iranian women with premature ovarian failure. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013; 29(6): 588-591.
Krauss CM, Turksoy RN, Atkins L, McLaughlin C, Brown LG, Page DC. Familial premature ovarian failure due to an interstitial deletion of the long arm of the X chromosome. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317(3): 125-131.
Powell CM, Taggart RT, Drumheller TC, Wangsa D, Qian C, Nelson LM. Molecular and cytogenetic studies of an X;autosome translocation in a patient with premature ovarian failure and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. 1994; 52(1): 19-26.
Miano MG, Laperuta C, Chiurazzi P, D’Urso M, Ursini MV. Ovarian dysfunction and FMR1 alleles in a large Italian family with POF and FRAXA disorders: case report. BMC Med Genet. 2007; 8: 18-18.
Murray A. Premature ovarian failure and the FMR1 gene. Semin Reprod Med. 2000; 18(1): 59-66.
Gleicher N, Barad DH. The FMR1 gene as regulator of ovarian recruitment and ovarian reserve. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010; 65(8): 523-530.
Eslami A, Farahmand K, Totonchi M, Madani T, Asadpour U, Zari Moradi S. FMR1 premutation: not only important in premature ovarian failure but also in diminished ovarian reserve. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017; 20(2): 120-125.
Schufreider A, McQueen DB, Lee SM, Allon R, Uhler ML, Davie J. Diminished ovarian reserve is not observed in infertility patients with high normal CGG repeats on the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(11): 2686-2692.
Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007; 447(7143): 396-398.
Berger SL, Kouzarides T, Shiekhattar R, Shilatifard A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes De. 2009; 23(7): 781-783.
Berger SL. The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription. Nature. 2007; 447(7143): 407-412.
Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001; 293(5532): 1074-1080.
Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007; 128(4): 693-705.
Bock C, Lengauer T. Computational epigenetics. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24(1): 1-10.
Weber M, Schübeler D. Genomic patterns of DNA methylation: targets and function of an epigenetic mark. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007; 19(3): 273-280.
Hutchins AS, Mullen AC, Lee HW, Sykes KJ, High FA, Hendrich BD. Gene silencing quantitatively controls the function of a developmental trans-activator. Mol Cell. 2002; 10(1): 81-91.
Jones PL, Veenstra G, Wade PA, Vermaak D, Kass SU, Landsberger N. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat Genet. 1998; 19(2): 187-191.
Nan X, Ng HH, Johnson CA, Laherty CD, Turner BM, Eisenman RN. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature. 1998; 393(6683): 386-389.
Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature. 2000; 403(6765): 41-45.
Lennartsson A, Ekwall K. Histone modification patterns and epigenetic codes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009; 1790(9): 863-868.
Grewal SI, Moazed D. Heterochromatin and epigenetic control of gene expression. Science. 2003; 301(5634): 798-802.
Lachner M, O’Sullivan RJ, Jenuwein T. An epigenetic road map for histone lysine methylation. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116(Pt 11): 2117-2124.
Coffee B, Zhang F, Ceman S, Warren ST, Reines D. Histone modifications depict an aberrantly heterochromatinized FMR1 gene in fragile x syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 71(4): 923-932.
Coffee B1, Zhang F, Warren ST, Reines D. Acetylated histones are associated with FMR1 in normal but not fragile X-syndrome cells. Nat Genet. 1999; 22(1): 98-101.
Pietrobono R, Tabolacci E, Zalfa F, Zito I, Terracciano A, Moscato U. Molecular dissection of the events leading to inactivation of the FMR1 gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2005; 14(2): 267-277.
Chiurazzi P, Pomponi MG, Willemsen R, Oostra BA, Neri G. In vitro reactivation of the FMR1 gene involved in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1998; 7(1): 109-113.
Chiurazzi P, Pomponi MG, Pietrobono R, Bakker CE, Neri G, Oostra BA. Synergistic effect of histone hyperacetylation and DNA demethylation in the reactivation of the FMR1 gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1999; 8(12): 2317-2323.
Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 16(3): 1215-1215.
Tassone F, Pan R, Amiri K, Taylor AK, Hagerman PJ. A rapid polymerase chain reaction-based screening method for identification of all expanded alleles of the fragile X (FMR1) gene in newborn and high-risk populations. J Mol Diagn. 2008; 10(1): 43-49.
Naumann A, Hochstein N, Weber S, Fanning E, Doerfler W. A distinct DNA-methylation boundary in the 5’upstream sequence of the FMR1 promoter binds nuclear proteins and is lost in fragile X syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 85(5): 606-616.
Tabolacci E, Neri G. Epigenetic modifications of the FMR1 gene. Methods Mol Biol. 2013; 1010: 141-153.
Tabolacci E, Pietrobono R, Moscato U, Oostra BA, Chiurazzi P, Neri G. Differential epigenetic modifications in the FMR1 gene of the fragile X syndrome after reactivating pharmacological treatments. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005; 13(5): 641-648.